Pepsi Prospectus - 112807 Words

The prospectus is being displayed in the website to make the prospectus accessible to more investors. The Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) assumes no responsibility for the correctness of any of the statements made or the opinions or reports expressed in the prospectus. Furthermore, the PSE makes no representation as to the completeness of the prospectus and disclaims any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from or in reliance in whole or in part on the contents of the prospectus. The offering information on this Web site is intended to be available only to Philippine and non-Philippine citizens residing in the Philippines or corporations or judicial entities organized and existing under Philippine law, and is not intended for†¦show more content†¦(incorporated with limited liability in the Republic of the Philippines) Primary and Secondary Offer of 1,142,348,680 Common Shares Offer Price of =3.50 per Offer Share P to be listed and traded on the First Board of the Philippine Stock Exchange, Inc. Sole Global Coordinator, Bookrunner and International Underwriter UBS Investment Bank Joint Domestic Lead Underwriters ATR KimEng Capital Partners, Inc. BDO Capital Investment Corporation Domestic Participating Underwriters ING Bank N.V., Manila Branch AB Capital and Investment Corporation RCBC Capital Corporation Multinational Investment Bancorporation Unicapital, Inc. PEPSI-COLA PRODUCTS PHILIPPINES, INC. KM. 29 NATIONAL ROAD, TUNASAN MUNTINLUPA CITY PHILIPPINES 1773 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (632) 850 7901 This Prospectus relates to the offer and sale of 1,142,348,680 common shares (the â€Å"Firm Offer,† and such shares, the â€Å"Firm Shares†), par value of P0.15 per share (the â€Å"Shares†), of Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc., a = corporation organized under Philippine law. The Firm Shares will comprise (i) 380,782,893 new Shares to be issued and offered by us by way of a primary offer (the â€Å"Primary Offer,† and such Shares, the â€Å"Primary Offer Shares†) as further described below and (ii) 761,565,787 existing Shares offered by Guoco Assets (Philippines), Inc. and The Nassim Fund (the â€Å"Selling Shareholders†) pursuant to a secondary offer (the â€Å"Secondary Offer†), and such Shares,Show MoreRelatedQ3 Innovation Essay1918 Words   |  8 Pagesbusiness there is typically more risk involved from a litigation standpoint. Although companies are insured, the sheer expense of seeking legal counsel has a greater negative impact upon smaller businesses than larger conglomerates like Tropicana, or Pepsi, who have large departments of in house counsels. The second option available to Nantucket Nectar is to sell the business. In reviewing their financial performance (see Exhibit 1), we notice that the business has had several years where they wereRead MoreIndian Premier League5288 Words   |  22 Pages and the remaining US$608m in the last five years. †¢ The central sponsors (DLF, Hero Honda, Pepsi, Citi, Vodafone, Kingfisher) have been tied up for a five-year period at approximately US$30m a year. Figure 2: Formula for revenue split Broadcasting revenue Year 1-3: BCCI gets 20%, teams get 80% Year 4-5: BCCI gets 30%, teams get 70% Year 6-10: BCCI gets 40%, teams get 60% Source: IPL franchise prospectus IPL will bring in Rs11.9bn revenue pa into cricket TV advertising - Rs6.5bn a year Every IPLRead MoreBusiness Studies Notes Full Syllabus22444 Words   |  90 PagesXII  Ã¢â‚¬â€œÃ‚  Ã‚  Business  Studies   AK interest is paid on it and it is rapaid also, after a fixed period of time or on expiry of its tenure. 3. Flotation Cost :- The cost involved in issuing securities such as broker s commission, underwriters fees, expenses on prospectus etc is called flotation cost. Higher the flotation cost, less attractive is the source of finance. Cash flow position of the business :- In case the cash flow position of a company is good enough then it can easily use borrowed funds. Control ConsiderationsRead MoreOpportunities23827 Words   |  96 Pagesconsiderably. By the mid-1990s, millions of North Americans associated the company’s name with superior dark-roast coffee, customized espresso drinks, responsive customer service, and an appealing store experience. Alliances with Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream, Pepsi-Cola Company, Capitol Records, Barnes Noble, United Airlines, and other organizations promised to broaden the Starbucks product line, distribution channels, and name recognition. Marketing experts and financial analysts, impressed with the company’sRead MorePractical Guide to Market Research62092 Words   |  249 PagesCoke became seriously concerned that it was losing market share to Pepsi. In 1984 it only had a 4.9% lead of Pepsi in the US. This was despite the fact that Coke outspent Pepsi on advertising, by upwards of $100 million per year. One major problem was that Pepsi’s advertising was simply more effective. The Pepsi Challenge had been fabulously successful: Pepsi made great play in its ads that in blind taste tests, people preferred Pepsi to Coke. Roy Stout, head of market research for Coca-Cola USA, putRead MoreCafe Coffee Day14374 Words   |  58 Pageshead Sudipta Sen Gupta is understandably quite excited about the cafe s prospectus. While the company is poised| |at launching 49 more cafes in the country, it is also looking at opening cafe chains worldwide- all before the financial year | |end. | |Sen Gupta started off her career with Compaq and Pepsi before she joined Cafe Coffee Day three years ago. She has been one ofRead MoreCorporation (Fisch) Outline Penn Law Essay62808 Words   |  252 Pagesthen refused to give Loft a discount. Megargel then informed Guth of Pepsi-Cola’s bankruptcy and Guth acquired Pepsi’s secret formula. Guth, without knowledge or consent of Loth’s board, drew upon Loft without limit to further the Pepsi enterprise (used Loft’s plant, materials, credit, executives, etc.). Guth claimed that he offered Loft the opportunity to take over the Pepsi enterprise, but that the board declined b/c Pepsi had proved to be a failure. o Issue: WhetherRead MoreMerger and Acquisition: Current Issues115629 Words   |  463 Pagescases of â€Å"Coca-Cola/Dr. Pepper† and â€Å"Pepsi/ Seven-Up†. Both mergers were objected to by the FTC because they would have implied the disappearance of the third and fourth most important firms in the American carbonated soft drinks market, consolidating the industry into only two important companies: Coca-Cola and Pepsi.8 This structural change would also have influenced the local bottling markets in many US states, since in the majority of them Coca-Cola and Pepsi had their own bottlers, and the remainingRead MoreStrategy Management18281 Words   |  74 Pagesdeveloped, and to gather student opinions, provided lots of useful feedback. Last, but certainly not least, I wish to thank the reviewers and focus group attendees who shared their expertise with us, from the very beginning when we developed the prospectus to the final text and cases that y ou hold in your hands. The reviewers have given us the greatest gift of all—the gift of time! These very special people are listed starting on page xxxii. I have long yearned to write a textbook that shows studentsRead MoreDomino Pizza 2013 10k83576 Words   |  335 PagesInformation Officer of Polk Global Automotive. Russell J. Weiner has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, since September 2008. Mr. Weiner held various marketing positions at Pepsi from 1998 to 2008, most recently serving as Vice President of Marketing, Colas for Pepsi-Cola North America. Patricia A. Wilmot has served as our Executive Vice President, PeopleFirst since July 2000. Ms. Wilmot was a human resources consultant from May 1999 to June 2000. Ms. Wilmot served